Lets dissect a few of his posts on IG shall we?(don't worry I will be as unbiased as I can, unlike him)
My favorite; his post about IG's Super Smash Bros. Brawl review.
"You know, I used to hate Super Smash Bros. Brawl." one sentence in and we already know how bias he will be.
"Easy, it was popular and lavishly praising the game would get him views." How dare this Internet reviewer review popular games to get views grrr.
As IG opens his review of Super Smash Bros "mee-lay"
"It’s “May-Lay”, you’re pronouncing it wrong!" How dare he pronounce a game differently then I do. What's next BatDan, you call him out for saying catsup instead of ketchup?
Now as IG goes on about the clone characters in Melee and how Brawl took care of the problem....
"NO IT DOESN’T! If anything it’s worse! Other than a different final smash, Ganondorf is still the same as Captain Falcon, Fox now has TWO clones with Falco and Wolf, Ness now has Lucas, and Young Link has been replaced with Toon Link and is still very similar to Link!"
Wow I doubt Batdan even played Brawl. He mentioned hating it earlier, so more then likely he rented it, played a few matches(not unlocking any of the characters he mentioned as "clones") and returned it. If, like myself, you've atleast completed the game, you could easily identify the huge differences in gameplay between the characters.
Ganondorf for example, is the exact opposite of Falcon. Ganon is slow and heavy, while Falcon is fast and light.
Ness is more offensive while Lucas is more defensive.
Fox and Falco are completely different. Fox is fast, while Falco is the high jumper. Falco also throws his reflector while fox doesn't. and Falco's blaster stuns opponents while Fox's doesn't.
Immediately following that load from BatdanNight night he follows it up with the most ironic comment; "the lack of research is worse than usual" No seriously, he says that after complaining about how Brawl still has clone characters. My god.....there's just no words to describe how ironic that line is.
Next from BatDanNight;
"He mentions how they got rid of “the duplicates” (as in the only 3 he mentioned), then Mewtwo, which he calls “not a big loss”. First off, fuck you. Mewtwo is awesome. Second, Mewtwo is technically still in Brawl, only his abilities transferred to Lucario. Then Roy, who he says was replaced by Ike. When he says his name he shows a picture of Ike from South Park. I know others have done this joke, yet somehow Bores completely failed with it. Lack of comic timing? Poor reaction? It’s up to you.
Yeah no bias there huh? Now in Melee; Mewtwo was my favorite character, but unlike this unprofessional prick, I'm not going to go apeshit because IG bashed my favorite character. anyway, again obvious Batdan didn't even beat the game, because when I played as Lucario I immediately noticed a difference between him and Mewtwo. The biggest being that Lucario's ability that makes it so the more damage he gets, the more he dishes out. He's also a bit heavier then Mewtwo. Now with Bores' Ike joke, I'll pick C. "I'm so bias that none of his jokes are funny." Or atleast that what Batdan chose.
BatDanNight:
"He brings up “huge milestones” which to him means the addition of Sonic the Hedgehog. “Nintendo and Sega together? Holy shit! Talk about world’s colliding!” This isn’t the first time it happened. Are you forgetting that one game you talked about? The one you called a piece of shit even though your only issue was that you sucked at the game? That one about the Olympics… ring a bell?"
yeah because there wasn't a huge outcry or anything for Sonic to be in the next Smash bros game, right? Now the game he is referring to is IG's review of Mario & Sonic @ Olympic Games. Lets see were the controls an issue with the game.......Yes they were. But again; I am focusing on BatDanNight, I'll cover Irate Gamer another time.
BatDanNight:
"He briefly mentions Snake (kind of obvious he’s never played Metal Gear Solid) and that the two have their own levels.
“Having these two extra characters around is pretty cool” You mean Bowser and ROB? Because that’s what the footage is showing"
I didn't realize that you can tell when somone didn't play a game series just by the few words the use to mention the main character. and yes Batdan, he means Bowser and ROB. not the 2 characters he JUST mentioned.
BatdanNight:
"IG mentions that he’s glad that Mr. Game & Watch is back because that’s his favorite character. You know why he said that? To make himself sound retro. I bet he doesn’t even know where he comes from. It’s really obvious when he’s faking it."
So the ONLY reason he can like G&W is because he wants to make himself sound retro. Maybe he actually does like the character. If you played the game for more then five minutes you'd know how fun G&W was in both games. I like him too; I guess that means I'm just a wannabe retro gamer too huh?
After IG goes over how he enjoyed Kid Icarus/Pit being in the game;
BatdanNight:
"His name isn’t Kid Icarus, it’s Pit! Kid Icarus was the game he was in. That would be like calling Marth “Fire Emblem” or Jigglypuff “Pokemon”. It gets worse when you remember that his name is listed below him on the select screen and the announcer says his name!"
Now is that such a huge crime? No. Kid Icarus was a very old Nintendo series, most people would only remember the character by the name of the game it was in.
BatDanNight:
"IG was worried that he would have to play with the Wii Remote + Nunchuck combo because it doesn’t work for fighting games. But is grateful when you could take out the Nunchuck and play with the remote on its side. Or you could not be an idiot and use a Gamecube controller, or the Classic controller. Not going to mention that are you?"
I guess I'm and idiot because I actually like playing it with the sideways Wii Remote. Granted IG should have brought up the GC and Classic controllers; most people got a Wii solely for Brawl. So most probably didn't have a Classic or Gamecube controller. Something bores should have brought up, but didn't have too.
BatdanNight:
"He says the graphics are “amazing” and sometimes found himself just staring at them. Sounds less like he was appreciating them and more like “ooooh I like shiny”."
What can I really say, he bashes IG for bringing up how the game looks. More immaturity from Batdan.
BatdanNight:
"IG brings up the stages. “All kinds of crazy places like castles and boats” Castles and boats? Shit man this game is insane right up there in the membrane! … So what games are those stages from? Anything? I don’t need the specific game, I’ll just accept the franchise it’s part of. No?"
Again, something he could have brought up, but he didn't have too.
"Then he brings up stages that “bring back that nostalgic feeling” and cites the Donkey Kong and Mario Bros. stages. Once again, Chris is trying to sound retro because he’s an obvious fraud."
Again more immature bashing of IG. whether he deserves or not; how does that affect the quality of his review? IT DOESN'T.
BatDanNight:
"IG moves onto Subspace Emissary and only says that the cut scenes look cool. Aren’t you going to bring up how the plot is like a bad fanfic?"
With Brawl; the whole Subspace story is pretty difficult to explain. Like most people, I assume people played it for the game play not the story.
BatdanNight:
" “This game is hella fun” What are you Eric Cartman?
Now before you people start hurling your "Irate Fanboy" insults at me, I don't care for IG. I don't hate him but I don't like him.
“Especially when there’s four people playing” You can tell I’m having fun with this footage of me fighting three computer-controlled opponents.
“There’s really nothing bad I can say about this game” Yes, just ignore a lot of the games’ faults, it’s perfect in every way… for you to get views from the crazy Smash Bros. fanbase."
Yup more immature bashing of IG, what does that have to do with the review again? Oh that's right NOTHING!! Again, obvious that BatDanNight never played the game for more then five minutes. The game has flaws yeah, but very very few that aren't even worth mentioning.
BatdanNight:
"IG wishes to see other “Nintendo legends” like Mega Man, Simon Belmont, and Bomberman? No no no NO! Those are not Nintendo characters! Mega Man is owned by Capcom, Simon Belmont and the Castlevania series are owned by Konami, Bomberman is owned by Hudson Soft! Yes they were on the NES but that doesn’t make them “Nintendo characters”."
A decent enough compliant. But to be fair, Metal Gear Solid was on the NES. So I can understand the confusion Bores might have had.
And that's pretty much it. BatdanNight goes on about some "Captain N Teheory" he has aswell as more immature bashing Bores and pretty much complaing how IG gave the game a good review.
Yes, BatdanNight deffienetly deserves a place on the "Internet Hit List" Though I doubt we've heard the last of him.
Now before you people start hurling your "Irate Fanboy" insults at me, I don't care for IG. I don't hate him but I don't like him.
I understand what BatdanNight is trying to do, but he ends up falling flat on his face because of his obvious bias and immature comments towards Bores.
He's criticized IG before for deleting and blocking users who point out his flaws, well believe it or not BatdanNight has started doing the EXACT same thing.
Well that all for now, see ya ;)
This kind of entry is fine for someone like BatDan who only works in text, but if you're going to cover people who make video's then it would be better to make video responses... While already done to death, watching a video sure as fuck beats reading about one.
ReplyDeleteStick this shit on your YT channel, if you have one, you'll reach a larger audience too.
Okay, so first off I'd like to congratulate you for finally putting your money where your mouth is and making your own blog. We suggested it, so it's only fair that you be commended for it.
ReplyDeleteSecond, I'd like to say how FUCKING PATHETIC it is that you really couldn't wait to try and get your petty little vengeance against BatDan. Seriously, you try to write a blog about "internet celebrities", and you open with BatDan? No offense to him, but on the grand scale of things, he could hardly be considered a celebrity by any means, and I believe he's probably aware of this. If you want to be taken seriously at all, talk about someone big league! AVGN, anyone from TGWTG, some webcomic artist, or anyone else who people other than those who have familiarized themselves with the whole IG debate might have actually heard of!
I might check this blog periodically to see if you've actually posted something worth reading here. You seem to think that you have something to say, and that you're more than just another troll. Prove it.
Well it certainly didn't take too long for BatDouche's white knighters to get her, lol.
Delete@lordlaharl: The irony, you call me pathetic because I ranted on your BFF Batdan. Need I remind you that you support his petty little blog where he obsesses over 1 insignificant reviewer. That's what pathetic is. Atleast I'm acknowledging other reviewers.
Actually, Metal Gear Solid was released on the PS1. You're probably thinking of Metal Gear, which was in fact released on the NES.
ReplyDeleteTechnically, Metal Gear is a MSX2 game. The NES version is a port made by a different team, which might explain some of its problems.
DeleteThanks. I at least wanted to point out that Metal Gear Solid was on a completely different platform.
DeleteI guess some people get confused because the only know the series as "Metal Gear Solid". At least the newer franchise had a slightly altered title, unlike Ninja Gaiden...
Delete>> Ahh, how fitting that we start off this list with one of the most delusional people on the Internet.
ReplyDeleteOne sentence in and we all know how biased YOU are. See what I did?
What so bad about someone initially hating a game, only to have it grow on him? How is that biased?
>> the whole clone debate
How can characters be "completely different" if they have the same moveset? I know they have some differences, but I wouldn't call them "huge". Mario and Link are "completely different". Ganondorf and Falcon? Different, but not that much.
>> What can I really say, he bashes IG for bringing up how the game looks. More immaturity from Batdan.
Seeing how Bores main complaint about TMNT was "Why can't this 8 bit game look like the 16 bit arcade version?!", he seems to value graphics slightly higher than neccessary.
1. It's simple, Hate + Hate = more hate. I.E. Batdan hates IG and made a point to say he hates brawl. So obviously he's not going to be completely fair.
Delete2. Maybe "completely different" wasn't the best choice of words. But the characters are different, While Batdan said they're were still clone characters.
3. So IG made one little comment, on one of his first video game reviews nonetheless and you're going to hold that against him forever? I don't recall him bringing graphics up in his other retro reviews.
"I don't care for IG" "I'll get to him later" *clap clap*. Also, i never knew BatDan is internet celebrity.
ReplyDelete1. ""His name isn’t Kid Icarus, it’s Pit! Kid Icarus was the game he was in. That would be like calling Marth “Fire Emblem” or Jigglypuff “Pokemon”. It gets worse when you remember that his name is listed below him on the select screen and the announcer says his name!"
ReplyDeleteNow is that such a huge crime? No. Kid Icarus was a very old Nintendo series, most people would only remember the character by the name of the game it was in."
Yeah, claiming to be an expert on a particular medium does usually mean that a person's expected to know their stuff. Now even then, it's not wrong for an expert to get things wrong "here" and "there", but when it's as constantly as Chris does it, any mistake tends to be another mark against his vids.
2. ""He says the graphics are “amazing” and sometimes found himself just staring at them. Sounds less like he was appreciating them and more like “ooooh I like shiny”."
What can I really say, he bashes IG for bringing up how the game looks. More immaturity from Batdan."
Taking someone's comment out of context doesn't a compelling argument make. Batdan's reason for making this statement is that Bores tends to be concerned more about graphics than overall gameplay.
Going with the Ninja Turtles example, he bashes TMNT 2 for not having arcade graphics. Sure he adds a complaint about the lack of 4 players, but he overlooks it for a 16-bit game.
And incidentally, this is why we come down on Bores a lot more than some of the other bad reviewers on YouTube. Many of those kid reviewers who bash a NES or SNES game for their graphics may be a lot worse than Bores, but since most of them didn't grow up when the NES was still around, it's understandable that they don't understand the limitations of an 8-bit machine.
Now graphics are important to a degree, but unless they hamper the more important aspect which is gameplay (Where's Waldo for the NES is a good example of graphics adding unintentional difficulty to the game), then it just seems a bit shallow to bash a fun game just because the graphics don't look like the realistic XBox PS3 ones.
Ok, now yes to your credit, you finally are giving detailed argument, but to really escape the troll sterotype, you need to directly respond to rebuttals made against you instead of the indirect responses consisting of insults (like your response to (lordlaharl).
1. Maybe if it was a more well known title Nintendo title like Kirby, LOZ, or Mario Bros. But when was the last time we saw a Kid Icarus game?(excluding the new 3DS one obviously).
Delete2. So why didn't Batdan say so? instead he decides to make a completely immature comment. Give me another example of Bores valuing graphics so highly. Because I only ever hear about his TMNT review. Unless that's the only time?
1. True KI is obscure in comparison, but I repeat, Chris claims to be an expert thus he comes off looking bad when he can't back that claim up.
DeleteBesides, he tends to make errors that even a casual gamer would call him out on, like the SNES predating the Genesis.
2. 2:53 on his MUSCLE review has him stating that the game should have an announcer like the one on a commerical he cuts to.
2a. And on a related note what's often annoying is that he tends to mark a game down for many trivial reason (by trivial I mean aspect which do not hamper the gameplay).
His biggest reason for claiming SMB 2 to be bad is simply that it's different from the previous SMB. On Tetris he considers the meter indicating how many of a particular block drop bad simply because it's useless (despite it having no negative effect on gameplay).
NEXT WEEK!!!
ReplyDeleteJames Rolfe(AVGN)
*throws away flame shield*
Very well, let's see if you actually have a reasonable argument against James Rolfe, or if you're just another Archdouche.
Delete""You know, I used to hate Super Smash Bros. Brawl." one sentence in and we already know how bias he will be."
ReplyDeleteExcept Biased means to believe without justification. The next line explains exactly why he doesn't hate brawl anymore.
""Easy, it was popular and lavishly praising the game would get him views." How dare this Internet reviewer review popular games to get views grrr."
The context of the line is that you quoted was the Irate gamer isn't going to add anything extra to the review to make it worth watching. Just because the game is popular doesn't you have to review it. If anything it just means that you'll have to work harder because people are expecting you to do different things.
""It’s “May-Lay”, you’re pronouncing it wrong!" How dare he pronounce a game differently then I do. What's next BatDan, you call him out for saying catsup instead of ketchup?"
Except its wrong to call ketchup catsup. The syllables are important. If some called a hospital a hotpial then someone is not getting to the ER on time. It would be forgivable if it was an accent or if the word was still distinguishable, but its not.
"ow as IG goes on about the clone characters in Melee and how Brawl took care of the problem....
"NO IT DOESN’T! If anything it’s worse! Other than a different final smash, Ganondorf is still the same as Captain Falcon, Fox now has TWO clones with Falco and Wolf, Ness now has Lucas, and Young Link has been replaced with Toon Link and is still very similar to Link!"
Wow I doubt Batdan even played Brawl. He mentioned hating it earlier, so more then likely he rented it, played a few matches(not unlocking any of the characters he mentioned as "clones") and returned it. If, like myself, you've atleast completed the game, you could easily identify the huge differences in gameplay between the characters.
Ganondorf for example, is the exact opposite of Falcon. Ganon is slow and heavy, while Falcon is fast and light.
Ness is more offensive while Lucas is more defensive.
Fox and Falco are completely different. Fox is fast, while Falco is the high jumper. Falco also throws his reflector while fox doesn't. and Falco's blaster stuns opponents while Fox's doesn't."
Except if you actually bothered to check if your opinions were correct you'd realize that Smash brothers has a long history of clone characters http://super-smash-bros.wikia.com/wiki/Clone.
Part 1
"Immediately following that load from BatdanNight night he follows it up with the most ironic comment; "the lack of research is worse than usual" No seriously, he says that after complaining about how Brawl still has clone characters. My god.....there's just no words to describe how ironic that line is."
DeleteIn academia, we call this a run on mistake. Its when the rest of the work depends on an assumption that is flawed and thus drags the rest of the article down because the beginning doesn't justify the rest.
"Next from BatDanNight;
"He mentions how they got rid of “the duplicates” (as in the only 3 he mentioned), then Mewtwo, which he calls “not a big loss”. First off, fuck you. Mewtwo is awesome. Second, Mewtwo is technically still in Brawl, only his abilities transferred to Lucario. Then Roy, who he says was replaced by Ike. When he says his name he shows a picture of Ike from South Park. I know others have done this joke, yet somehow Bores completely failed with it. Lack of comic timing? Poor reaction? It’s up to you."
Geez you couldn't even quote it properly could you. You didn't even specify what part was the quote. I actually thought it was the same style as the rest of the article where you put a quote and then add commentary. But instead your commentary was longer than his quote.
"Yeah no bias there huh? Now in Melee; Mewtwo was my favorite character, but unlike this unprofessional prick, I'm not going to go apeshit because IG bashed my favorite character. anyway, again obvious Batdan didn't even beat the game, because when I played as Lucario I immediately noticed a difference between him and Mewtwo. The biggest being that Lucario's ability that makes it so the more damage he gets, the more he dishes out. He's also a bit heavier then Mewtwo. Now with Bores' Ike joke, I'll pick C. "I'm so bias that none of his jokes are funny." Or atleast that what Batdan chose."
Grammar aside, you're got serious problems here. The first off being that you overstate his reaction. Apeshit is not an appropriate word here especially since the rant is shorter than 5 sentences. There's also a severe lack of link between not completely understanding lucario and not beating the game. In fact, Batdan doesn't even claim he beat the game, though its likely he did since there's still dozens of other characters he could finish the game with. The last sentence demonstrates how immature you are as well. Bias should be biased because bias is present tense. The second problem is that you conjecture that Batdan didn't get the joke because he didn't understand its audience. That's just silly and makes your claim of bias weak especially since Batdan let people choose, instead of just telling them what to think.
"BatDanNight:
"He brings up “huge milestones” which to him means the addition of Sonic the Hedgehog. “Nintendo and Sega together? Holy shit! Talk about world’s colliding!” This isn’t the first time it happened. Are you forgetting that one game you talked about? The one you called a piece of shit even though your only issue was that you sucked at the game? That one about the Olympics… ring a bell?""
hmm so it seems you've adopted a new style about quarter through the article. This inconsistency only harms the creditability of your article. Perhaps if you kept the same style throughout, you's seem more professional. Otherwise it looks like you wrote the first 10 sentences, went for a sandwich and then came back to write more.
part 2
"yeah because there wasn't a huge outcry or anything for Sonic to be in the next Smash bros game, right? Now the game he is referring to is IG's review of Mario & Sonic @ Olympic Games. Lets see were the controls an issue with the game.......Yes they were. But again; I am focusing on BatDanNight, I'll cover Irate Gamer another time."
DeleteAgain you make the fundamental mistake of assuming Batdan said something he never did. If he had said its not big deal that Sonic is in smash bro game (and it wasn't, since he brought gamebreaking powers and it has been stated that he won't be in the next) then maybe you could argue that. But he didn't. The controls for sonic and mario at the Olympics were bad. Bad means unresponsive. The controls were considered complicated and Irate gamer never demonstrated that he actually tried to learn the controls. You never did bother to cover the Irate gamer either. Just Batdan and AVGN before calling it quits. Perhaps you don't understand the word bias. Its a term that applies to certain people who don't justifications for their actions and beliefs.
"BatDanNight:
"He briefly mentions Snake (kind of obvious he’s never played Metal Gear Solid) and that the two have their own levels.
“Having these two extra characters around is pretty cool” You mean Bowser and ROB? Because that’s what the footage is showing"
I didn't realize that you can tell when somone didn't play a game series just by the few words the use to mention the main character. and yes Batdan, he means Bowser and ROB. not the 2 characters he JUST mentioned."
Spelling aside, how does this prove Batdan didn't play the game? And how are you sure IG meant Bowser and ROB were cool characters? From a narrative point of view this sudden shift makes no sense. If he was talking about two characters sonic and snake, and then says those two characters are cool, shouldn't it mean that sonic and snake are cool and not the just introduced ROB and Bowser? You sure you interpreted IG's review properly?
"BatdanNight:
"IG mentions that he’s glad that Mr. Game & Watch is back because that’s his favorite character. You know why he said that? To make himself sound retro. I bet he doesn’t even know where he comes from. It’s really obvious when he’s faking it."
So the ONLY reason he can like G&W is because he wants to make himself sound retro. Maybe he actually does like the character. If you played the game for more then five minutes you'd know how fun G&W was in both games. I like him too; I guess that means I'm just a wannabe retro gamer too huh?"
Yeah I guess that does make you a wannabe retro gamer because you didn't explain who game and watch is, and why you like him. This line attempts to invoke pathos and ethos but it fails because you don't show why you have personal experience and why people should find Batdan's somewhat overly generalized concept offensive.
After IG goes over how he enjoyed Kid Icarus/Pit being in the game;
"BatdanNight:
"His name isn’t Kid Icarus, it’s Pit! Kid Icarus was the game he was in. That would be like calling Marth “Fire Emblem” or Jigglypuff “Pokemon”. It gets worse when you remember that his name is listed below him on the select screen and the announcer says his name!"
Now is that such a huge crime? No. Kid Icarus was a very old Nintendo series, most people would only remember the character by the name of the game it was in."
Um yes it is a huge crime. It should be noted that you again misinterpreted and added extra clauses. Batdan never said it was criminal to not name it properly only the context of situation is that Batdan had previously insinuated that IG only knows stuff from Captain N the game master and demonstrates this by not being able to read the character select screen. Its rather sad if IG played the game for 12 hours and couldn't remember the names of characters he liked
"BatDanNight:
Delete"IG was worried that he would have to play with the Wii Remote + Nunchuck combo because it doesn’t work for fighting games. But is grateful when you could take out the Nunchuck and play with the remote on its side. Or you could not be an idiot and use a Gamecube controller, or the Classic controller. Not going to mention that are you?"
I guess I'm and idiot because I actually like playing it with the sideways Wii Remote. Granted IG should have brought up the GC and Classic controllers; most people got a Wii solely for Brawl. So most probably didn't have a Classic or Gamecube controller. Something bores should have brought up, but didn't have too."
spelling and grammar aside, You attempt to invoke ethos by siding with Batdan on this but then stating that the issue doesn't matter trying to show that you have decency and reasonable logic. But your logic is flawed, its a two step nonsense argument with the first premise being that most people bought the Wii only for brawl and a conclusion that states that people thus don't have classic game cube controllers. The problem is obvious, if people bought wii for brawl then what about the smash bros on the gamecube? Did people not buy gamecubes for smash bros then? The argument if valid, makes it so that Irate gamer should have mentioned it. The argument if invalid, means that you're wrong and that Irate gamer should be mentioned it anyway. You've created a logical dilemma due your inexperience with the English language and have doomed your argument here.
"BatdanNight:
"He says the graphics are “amazing” and sometimes found himself just staring at them. Sounds less like he was appreciating them and more like “ooooh I like shiny”."
What can I really say, he bashes IG for bringing up how the game looks. More immaturity from Batdan."
Again another misinterpretation of the line because Batdan is criticizing the unnecessary comment that IG makes about staring at the graphics. No gamer would be so distracted by graphics to the point of staring at them to the detriment of their skill at the game.
"BatdanNight:
"IG brings up the stages. “All kinds of crazy places like castles and boats” Castles and boats? Shit man this game is insane right up there in the membrane! … So what games are those stages from? Anything? I don’t need the specific game, I’ll just accept the franchise it’s part of. No?"
Again, something he could have brought up, but he didn't have too."
You didn't justify why he didn't have to. Grammar aside, There are plenty of reasons why IG should have brought it up. One of many reasons being that he should differentiate himself from other reviewers by doing things in depth. Another one being that it helps his "I've played these games for 20 years" statement look credible if he's able to name all the levels and the franchises they represent.
part 4 (part 3 wasn't labeled)
"BatdanNight:
Delete"Then he brings up stages that “bring back that nostalgic feeling” and cites the Donkey Kong and Mario Bros. stages. Once again, Chris is trying to sound retro because he’s an obvious fraud."
Again more immature bashing of IG. whether he deserves or not; how does that affect the quality of his review? IT DOESN'T."
How is this immature bashing? Grammar aside, This does quite heavily affect the the quality of his review. When a reviewer says he/she likes a certain stage, then they are showing their own personal preferences. Likewise when IG doesn't explain why he likes the stages and just says its because they're notsalgic, then it makes IG look like a retro fraud. It doesn't help that there are way cooler levels and IG would be liked alot more if he just stated his true opinion.
"BatDanNight:
"IG moves onto Subspace Emissary and only says that the cut scenes look cool. Aren’t you going to bring up how the plot is like a bad fanfic?"
With Brawl; the whole Subspace story is pretty difficult to explain. Like most people, I assume people played it for the game play not the story."
Batdan is asking IG to put some depth into his review by providing a brief opinion on the plot of the game. You're comment here is almost completely irrelevant.
"BatdanNight:
" “This game is hella fun” What are you Eric Cartman?
“Especially when there’s four people playing” You can tell I’m having fun with this footage of me fighting three computer-controlled opponents.
“There’s really nothing bad I can say about this game” Yes, just ignore a lot of the games’ faults, it’s perfect in every way… for you to get views from the crazy Smash Bros. fanbase."
Yup more immature bashing of IG, what does that have to do with the review again? Oh that's right NOTHING!! Again, obvious that BatDanNight never played the game for more then five minutes. The game has flaws yeah, but very very few that aren't even worth mentioning."
What do you mean that has nothing to do with the review? It has everything to do with the review. IG thinks he can just say that the game is fun by showing him and 3 other computer opponents sitting around? When someone says 4 players they mean 4 humans present. Relying on quotes from southpark does not help get across the point that the game is good. There's no obvious hints or evidence that Batdan did not play the game for 5 minutes. He's demonstrated more research then you have and reflects a better portion of the fanbase then you do. Half the things you do say about the game are wrong which destroys any attempts at Ethos because it shows you didn't play the game and making things up. Pathos is destroyed because you never rationalize your own thoughts. Just saying he doesn't need to cover this or Batdan is bias doesn't mean anything unless you rationalize it. Otherwise you're being biased, and people like me can and will point that out. Oh wait, this article isn't done yet.
part 5
"BatdanNight:
Delete"IG wishes to see other “Nintendo legends” like Mega Man, Simon Belmont, and Bomberman? No no no NO! Those are not Nintendo characters! Mega Man is owned by Capcom, Simon Belmont and the Castlevania series are owned by Konami, Bomberman is owned by Hudson Soft! Yes they were on the NES but that doesn’t make them “Nintendo characters”."
A decent enough compliant. But to be fair, Metal Gear Solid was on the NES. So I can understand the confusion Bores might have had."
What do you mean you understand the confusion bore's might have had? can you explain his train of thought. No? you didn't try to? Then okay, you understand his confusion meanwhile the reader will not and you're attempt at logos fails at a logical level. BUT WAIT, the article isn't done yet!
"Yes, BatdanNight deffienetly deserves a place on the "Internet Hit List" Though I doubt we've heard the last of him."
AT this point you should provide a summary. Because you haven't explained what the criteria of your hit list is and why Batdan should be on it.
"Now before you people start hurling your "Irate Fanboy" insults at me, I don't care for IG. I don't hate him but I don't like him."
Yet you brush off every complain Batdan has against him. You attempt to invoke Ethos by accepting the complaint but fail when you say the complaint isn't worth it without justification. You try to paint Batdan with 'bias' but fail because you don't justify why. Everyone is so convinced that you're not a IG fan. That's why you never targeted him on this list and never made fun of him or accepted wholesale any of the legitimate claims Batdan did. As much as people like to paint the IG sucks blog as an AVGN fanboy site, we have quite a lot of people who hate AVGN and are willing to call him out on his shit. Such as the E-beggin scandal in which we decided that AVGN should get flak for accepting a deal he knew nothing about. See? I invoked ethos. I demonstrated that I and the blog have character and are reasonable people who do not abuse their standing. Why you can't do this I'll never understand but perhaps that's because you have bias and are so bad at writing you can't understand there's a past tense verb for bias.
part 6
"I understand what BatdanNight is trying to do, but he ends up falling flat on his face because of his obvious bias and immature comments towards Bores.
DeleteHe's criticized IG before for deleting and blocking users who point out his flaws, well believe it or not BatdanNight has started doing the EXACT same thing."
Bias was used correctly here but the run on mistake is where the car crash becomes the most explosive. Since you failed to prove he has bias and did not explain why his comments are immature, you fail to underline the reason why he falls on his face. To top it off, you end with the statement that Batdan blocks people, which he hasn't done and you couldn't be bothered to be responsible provide readers with an actual example of this.
"Well that all for now, see ya ;)"
Yeah I can see why you winked. This is very much tongue in cheek. If you were trying to parody and insult everyone who has grievances against the Irate gamer sucks blog, then you have succeeded. The grammar is atrocious, the spelling is inconsistent and the message is non-sense. Half the time you throw key-words such as bias and immature around with reckless regard to their actual meanings demonstrating that you don't know what those words mean. You demonstrate a clear hypocritical bias for Chris Bores and the entire article reads like one giant in-joke that's only understandable by people who hate the blog. Half your statements are not even backed up which means that certainly must be an in-joke because only people who in on the joke would understand what you mean when you call a comment immature when its clearly not even explained by another easily written line of text.
Rating of your analysis -50
With -50 being the worst and 50 being the best
This is the most immature, pathetic and nonsensical blog post I have ever read. This worse then when Paul Watson wrote that Japanese kill whales because their culture is built on senseless bloodshed and that whaling funded rape of Nanking (http://www.seashepherd.fr/news-and-media/editorial-060627-1.html). The sheer audacity and dependence on the reader to be ignorant of the issue is astounding. This isn't an article of fail, this is an article that is a sign, a sign of how immature the opposition against Irate Gamer sucks blog really is.
part 7- Final